Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us,
The true motivations behind NATO’s involvement in the Ukraine War have always been shrouded in mystery. From the perspective of an unbiased observer, it is clear that Ukraine’s situation is not directly related to the interests of the western world, European security, or the economic prosperity of the United States. Nevertheless, since 2014, NATO and the globalist elite have been meddling in the region, laying the groundwork for a potential conflict with Russia.
It is important to note that my stance is not pro-Russia or pro-Ukraine. The Kremlin has its own connections to the globalist agenda, as I have discussed in previous articles. The extent of these ties is a topic of debate – perhaps Russia has grown disillusioned with the globalist cabal and is no longer seeking a place at their table. What is certain is that the western elites are actively seeking a global conflict, and they have spared no effort in trying to instigate one.
Imagine if the roles were reversed, and Russia was engaging in similar destabilization efforts, control measures, and arms proliferation in Mexico (similar to what the Soviets did in Cuba in the 1960s). In such a scenario, a preemptive US intervention in Mexico would be deemed justifiable.
Putin’s intentions, regardless of whether they align with Russia’s best interests, are irrelevant. The war was inevitable due to NATO’s relentless provocations. But what purpose does this proxy war serve? In reality, it serves little purpose unless the ultimate goal is to spark a global conflict between East and West, a scenario that would greatly benefit the globalist agenda.
World War III is a strategic opportunity for the Davos elite. It provides a scapegoat for the economic collapse they have orchestrated, amplifies global fear, and creates a sense of dependence on political leaders to solve all crises. Additionally, it offers a chance to eliminate domestic opposition by labeling them as collaborators with Russia if they resist unconstitutional mandates.
Furthermore, a global conflict would send young dissenters to the battlefield, ensuring that a new generation of freedom fighters does not emerge. From the perspective of the globalists, World War III is a triple win, as long as it avoids a full-scale nuclear catastrophe that would destroy their meticulously constructed surveillance states.
However, orchestrating the transition from a proxy war to a global conflict without being perceived as the aggressors poses a significant challenge.
The key lies in provoking Russia to a point where a dramatic escalation occurs. Russia would need to take actions that endanger a significant number of civilians, necessitating increased NATO involvement and potential UN intervention. The ideal scenario for the globalists would involve Russia committing a major atrocity, such as leveling a city with hundreds of thousands of inhabitants or deploying MOABs or nuclear weapons.
Recent developments suggest that popular support for providing military aid to Ukraine is waning, and Ukraine is on the brink of defeat. The Kursk offensive can be seen as a desperate move prompted by this realization.
The Kursk region, with its limited strategic value, appears to be an odd choice for Ukraine’s offensive. While theories suggest that the operation aimed to divert Russia’s crack troops from the Donbas front, the results have been disappointing for Ukraine.
Reports indicate that Russia has contained Ukraine’s forces in Kursk and is making significant advances in other key areas. The failure of the Kursk operation to achieve its objectives raises questions about its true purpose.
Russia’s extensive missile and drone strikes across Ukrainian territories further demonstrate the resilience of the Russian military and refute earlier NATO claims of Russian weakness.
One plausible explanation for Ukraine’s actions in Kursk is to alter the narrative and provoke Russia into a disproportionate response, potentially leading to NATO intervention.
The Atlantic Council, a prominent globalist think tank with ties to the World Economic Forum, plays a crucial role in shaping strategic decisions and propaganda surrounding the Ukraine conflict.
Proposals for large-scale missile strikes on Russia, promoted by the Atlantic Council, could escalate the conflict and push western powers towards direct military engagement with Russia.
The Atlantic Council’s influence extends to advising the Ukrainian government and NATO on war strategies and policies. Their involvement underscores the globalist agenda of drawing Ukraine into the EU and NATO, a primary driver behind the conflict.
In conclusion, the push for missile strikes on Russia and the escalating tensions in Ukraine serve the interests of the globalist elite seeking to instigate a wider conflict before the upcoming US elections.
* * *
To stay informed on strategies for countering the globalist agenda and support Alt-Market’s work, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter, The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
Loading…