Choosing between a new Chicago apartment or a home in Milwaukee can be a tough decision. Both cities offer unique lifestyles – Chicago with its bustling job market and cultural opportunities, and Milwaukee with its lower cost of living and community vibe.
Before making a decision, it’s important to consider factors like real estate affordability, job opportunities, and overall quality of life. In this article, we’ll compare the key differences between Chicago and Milwaukee to help you make an informed choice.
Housing in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Chicago and Milwaukee have distinct real estate markets. Chicago offers a mix of housing styles, from high-rise condos to historic homes in neighborhoods like Lincoln Park and Wicker Park. Housing in Chicago is pricier but still affordable compared to other major cities.
- Median home cost in Chicago: Around $370,000, offering more space and value compared to cities like NYC or San Francisco.
- Average rental cost: Chicago’s rent is approximately $2,223 per month, with higher prices in areas like the Loop and River North.
Housing in Milwaukee
Milwaukee is known for its affordability and diverse housing options, from bungalows to modern apartments. It offers a more relaxed pace of life, making it an attractive choice for those seeking a balance of affordability and quality of life.
Cost of living in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Milwaukee’s cost of living is 12% lower than Chicago’s, with differences in utilities, transportation, and lifestyle expenses. Chicago’s higher costs are due to its size and urban amenities, while Milwaukee offers a more affordable lifestyle.
1. Utilities
Milwaukee’s utilities are 1% higher than Chicago’s, but efficiency and lower costs overall make it a more affordable option.
2. Groceries
Groceries in Milwaukee are 2% less expensive than in Chicago, thanks to lower transportation costs and proximity to agricultural regions.
3. Transportation
Transportation costs in Milwaukee are 4% lower than in Chicago, with simpler roadways and lower parking fees contributing to the savings.
4. Healthcare
Healthcare in Milwaukee is 1% less expensive than in Chicago, making it a more budget-friendly option for residents.
5. Lifestyle
Milwaukee’s lifestyle expenses are 9% less than Chicago’s, offering a more relaxed and affordable living experience.
Chicago vs Milwaukee in size and population
Chicago and Milwaukee differ in size and population, with Chicago being larger and more densely populated. Milwaukee, on the other hand, is smaller and offers a more relaxed feel. Chicago’s size allows for a wide range of experiences, while Milwaukee’s compact design fosters a close-knit community vibe.
Weather and climate in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Both cities experience the full range of seasons, with Chicago’s winters being slightly harsher due to its urban area. Milwaukee, while also facing winter weather, tends to be milder overall. Both cities share a risk of severe thunderstorms in the summer.
The job market in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Chicago: A hub for finance, manufacturing, and healthcare
Chicago’s economy is powered by finance, manufacturing, and healthcare industries, offering diverse job opportunities with a median household income of $74,000. The city is home to major employers like Northern Trust and Abbott Laboratories.
Milwaukee: Embracing its industrial heritage and growing healthcare sector
Milwaukee’s job market thrives on its industrial history and growing healthcare sector, offering competitive opportunities with a median household income of $61,000. Major employers like Aurora Health Care and Molson Coors Beverage Company drive job creation in the city.
Transportation in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Chicago: Extensive transit options with car-friendly infrastructure
Chicago offers a well-developed public transportation system, making it easy to navigate without a car. Biking and walking are popular options, with accessible parking and wider streets for drivers.
Milwaukee: Car-centric with emerging transit options
Milwaukee’s compact layout makes driving the primary choice for residents, but the city also offers bus services and a streetcar line. Biking is becoming more popular with added lanes and trails.
Travel in and out of Chicago vs Milwaukee
Both cities offer convenient travel options, with Chicago serving as a major transportation hub and Milwaukee providing strong regional connections.
- Chicago: O’Hare and Midway airports, Amtrak services, Greyhound buses, and scenic cruises from the city’s port.
- Milwaukee: Mitchell International Airport, Amtrak’s Hiawatha service, Greyhound buses, and Lake Michigan ferries.
Lifestyle and things to do in Chicago vs Milwaukee
A day in Chicago
Chicago offers a blend of urban life and warmth, with diverse cultural opportunities. From museums to live music venues, the city has something for everyone. Outdoor activities, festivals, and sports events add to the vibrant lifestyle.
A day in Milwaukee
Milwaukee’s laid-back lifestyle includes coffee shops, river walks, and beer culture. Festivals, art galleries, and sports events make the city a charming place to live.
Food and culture in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Chicago: Diverse culinary scene and cultural offerings
Chicago is known for its iconic dishes and diverse food scene, with cultural festivals and live performances adding to the city’s charm.
Milwaukee: Embracing its brewing heritage and culinary diversity
Milwaukee’s food scene reflects its brewing heritage, with a focus on beer and local cuisine. The city’s cultural events and art scene contribute to its unique appeal.
Sports scene in Chicago vs Milwaukee
Chicago: Home to historic teams and passionate fans
Chicago’s sports culture revolves around teams like the Bulls, Cubs, Bears, and Blackhawks, drawing loyal fans to games throughout the year.
Milwaukee: Proud of its basketball and baseball teams
Milwaukee celebrates the Bucks and Brewers, with a strong fan base and exciting games at venues like Fiserv Forum and American Family Field.