Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Helios Blockchain Partners ZNS Connect to Launch Web3 Naming on Testnet

July 30, 2025

Will ADA outperform Bitcoin? – Charles Hoskinson’s 100x prediction explained

July 30, 2025

First Look: Inside United’s Newest Denver Club

July 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Wednesday, July 30
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Real Estate»Court denies NAR’s request for rehearing in DOJ investigation case
Real Estate

Court denies NAR’s request for rehearing in DOJ investigation case

July 12, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., has rejected a request from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) for a rehearing of the court’s decision allowing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to reopen an investigation into the trade organization.

The legal battle over the DOJ investigation has been ongoing since the Trump administration. In November 2020, the DOJ had agreed to close its investigation into NAR after reaching a settlement on an antitrust probe related to buyer agent compensation. However, in July 2021, the Biden administration withdrew the settlement and reopened the investigation. Following objections from NAR, a three-judge panel in D.C. ruled in April 2024 that the DOJ could proceed with the investigation. NAR’s petition for a rehearing was denied on Friday.

Both NAR and the DOJ have not yet provided comments on the recent developments.

During the legal proceedings, NAR settled a class-action lawsuit in Missouri in March, agreeing to pay $418 million over four years to home sellers. NAR also made changes to its rules, including removing the requirement for buyer agent compensation offers on multiple listing services, effective August 17.

Since the Missouri settlement, several similar lawsuits have been filed across the country, involving major real estate brokerages like Anywhere, Keller Williams, and RE/MAX.

In addition to the denial of NAR’s rehearing request, there have been other developments related to the DOJ and Realtor associations. The California Association of Realtors announced that it will release new forms for its members on July 24, following a formal inquiry by the DOJ into the association’s forms. The DOJ expressed concerns about potential loopholes that could allow Realtors to bypass the new rules coming into effect soon.

Related

case Court Denies DOJ investigation NARs rehearing request
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Why we should be cheering for the mom-and-pop investors in the housing market

July 29, 2025

Yes, You Can Sell A House As-Is—No Inspection Needed

July 29, 2025

Anthony Hsieh reclaims CEO role at loanDepot

July 28, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Custodial Roth IRA: How and why to start a Roth IRA for kids

August 29, 20240 Views

Bond ladder: What it is and how to build one

July 5, 20240 Views

Is Earnest Money Refundable? | Redfin

July 14, 20250 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Crypto

Helios Blockchain Partners ZNS Connect to Launch Web3 Naming on Testnet

July 30, 20250
Crypto

Will ADA outperform Bitcoin? – Charles Hoskinson’s 100x prediction explained

July 30, 20250
Personal Finance

First Look: Inside United’s Newest Denver Club

July 29, 20250
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2025 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.