Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

January Mortgage Outlook: New Year, Same Rates

January 7, 2026

Blockchain Platform Turns Plastic Recovery Into Data

January 7, 2026

‘Industrial-grade settlement’ – Does XRP now have an edge other altcoins don’t?

January 7, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Wednesday, January 7
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Crypto»Maybe permanent uptime isn’t a Web3 thing after all
Crypto

Maybe permanent uptime isn’t a Web3 thing after all

September 1, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Crypto and blockchain technology have drawn inspiration from the big-tech dominated Web2 era, inheriting traits such as occasional downtime.

On October 4, 2021, Facebook experienced a seven-hour outage — a duration that coincidentally matched the downtime of the Telegram-associated blockchain TON.

TON’s outage was reportedly triggered by a memecoin airdrop called DOGS, featuring a canine mascot allegedly created by Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram who is currently under arrest.

The October 2021 Facebook outage was one of the most prominent in its history, affecting not only Facebook but also its sister platforms WhatsApp and Instagram, leaving Web2’s flagship apps inaccessible to users worldwide.

During the outage, developers and other professionals were unable to access essential tools and communication platforms. Some employees were even unable to enter company premises or conference rooms due to the authentication systems being offline.

Read more: Solana price is getting better at shaking off major outages

Despite efforts to decentralize its operations, Facebook found itself disconnected from the internet due to a single bug, highlighting the vulnerability of centralized systems.

Major tech companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook have built their own internal networks, allowing them to remain online without depending on external providers. These companies also distribute their data centers globally to ensure redundancy and mitigate the risk of data loss during natural disasters.

Although Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram were technically still operational during the outage, the internet was unable to route traffic to these platforms.

The root cause of the Facebook outage was identified as a configuration error in the Border Gateway Protocol v4, a crucial component of internet routing infrastructure.

The recent outage of TON may have experienced a similar technical issue, but without a detailed analysis, the exact cause remains unknown.

The DOGS airdrop led to a surge in on-chain activity, causing validators to lose consensus and resulting in the network’s inability to process transactions efficiently.

When the airdrop was activated, the network experienced a peak of 280 transactions per second, far below the advertised capacity of TON, leading to the network’s disruption.

The flatlining orange area shows when the TON outage occurred (Source)

Prior incidents, such as the December event caused by spam transactions, have highlighted the network’s limitations in handling high transaction volumes.

Validators coordinated to restart the chain following the outage, a strategy similar to Solana’s approach to resolving technical issues.

It remains uncertain whether centralization played a role in the TON outage, emphasizing the importance of diverse validator clients to enhance network resilience.

“The short answer is ‘tech is subpar and could be improved,'” stated Mikko Ohtamaa, an early Bitcoin developer and cofounder of Trading Strategy. He emphasized the need for transparency in security audits to address underlying issues.

Decentralization in blockchain technology exists on a spectrum, with some networks demonstrating greater resilience to downtime than others. The market’s response to outages indicates a level of trust in development teams’ ability to address technical challenges.

In the Web3 space, decentralization primarily focuses on preventing single points of control rather than absolute immunity to downtime.

Perhaps in the era of Web4, advancements in technology will offer more robust solutions to mitigate downtime and enhance network reliability.

A modified version of this article first appeared in the daily Empire newsletter. Subscribe here so you don’t miss tomorrow’s edition.

Isnt permanent Uptime Web3
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Blockchain Platform Turns Plastic Recovery Into Data

January 7, 2026

‘Industrial-grade settlement’ – Does XRP now have an edge other altcoins don’t?

January 7, 2026

Luffa Taps WeRoam to Streamline Decentralized Connectivity in Web3

January 7, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Watch: Chaos Erupts During White House Press Briefing Over Biden-Parkinson’s Questions

July 8, 20240 Views

Do I need a financial advisor? When to consider getting one

November 2, 20248 Views

Storing a Credit Card as a Payment Method? Keep These Things in Mind

December 3, 20250 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Personal Finance

January Mortgage Outlook: New Year, Same Rates

January 7, 20260
Crypto

Blockchain Platform Turns Plastic Recovery Into Data

January 7, 20260
Crypto

‘Industrial-grade settlement’ – Does XRP now have an edge other altcoins don’t?

January 7, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.