Target experienced a significant drop in shares, falling by as much as 11% in premarket trading following the announcement of CEO Brian Cornell’s replacement by CFO Michael Fiddelke. The sudden change in leadership, set to take effect in the first quarter of 2026, comes as Target’s efforts to turn around its performance have not yielded positive results. The retailer also disclosed second-quarter results showing continued sales declines, decreased traffic, and a forecast indicating ongoing challenges until the end of the year.
The board of directors at Target unanimously selected Fiddelke, who currently serves as CFO, as the next CEO, effective February. Cornell, who has been at the helm since 2014, will transition to the role of executive chair. This leadership shift comes as Target struggles with its turnaround strategy and faces increasing competition from rivals like Walmart and Amazon.
Fiddelke expressed a sense of urgency to rejuvenate growth and profitability during the earnings call, emphasizing the need to address existing challenges. Christine Leahy, the lead independent director of Target’s board, voiced confidence in Fiddelke’s ability to lead the company back to growth and strengthen its position in the competitive retail landscape.
The market responded to the leadership announcement with a steep decline in Target’s stock price, possibly reflecting disappointment among institutional investors seeking a fresh perspective to address the company’s recent marketing missteps. Despite efforts to appeal to a broad customer base, Target faced backlash from various quarters, leading to boycotts and a decline in sales.
Data analysis by Bloomberg revealed ongoing challenges for Target, with sales shrinking, margins weakening, and traffic declining in the second quarter. While some metrics showed signs of improvement compared to previous estimates, overall performance remained below expectations. The company’s full-year forecast indicates a cautious outlook, with management maintaining guidance amid persistent headwinds in the retail sector.
In conclusion, Target’s decision to change leadership reflects the need for a new approach to drive growth and overcome current challenges. The lack of external hiring in key positions may have contributed to the market’s negative reaction, highlighting the importance of fresh perspectives in guiding the company’s future direction. Analysts are cautiously optimistic about Target’s prospects, suggesting that a turnaround may still be a work in progress.