Donald Trump stirred up controversy among business groups and fellow Republicans when he initiated a trade war by imposing significant tariffs on the US’s top three trading partners.
Various trade associations representing industries such as consumer goods, oil, groceries, and automakers expressed concern over the potential impact of Trump’s tariffs. They warned that these tariffs, which included 10% on imports from China, 25% on all imports from Mexico and Canada, and a lower 10% levy for Canadian energy, could lead to price increases for American consumers and disrupt supply chains.
John Murphy, senior vice-president of the US Chamber of Commerce, criticized the tariffs stating, “The president is right to address issues like our border security and the opioid crisis, but imposing tariffs will not solve these problems and will only burden American families with higher prices.”
Consumer product groups cautioned that grocery prices could rise, while automakers feared increased costs for building vehicles in the US.
The Peterson Institute’s Kim Clausing warned that the tariffs could result in “the largest tax increase since the 1990s” and could have a significant negative impact on the US economy.
Trump’s decision to impose steep tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China triggered responses from these countries, with Canada announcing retaliatory tariffs on a range of US goods.
On social media, Trump continued his aggressive stance, criticizing US trade deficits and suggesting that Canada should become the 51st state.
Lawmakers, including Republican Senator Tim Scott, condemned the tariffs as harmful to American consumers and allies. Congressional Democrats also criticized the move, calling for more strategic and targeted measures to protect American interests.
The Peterson Institute estimated that the tariffs could have negative economic consequences for all countries involved, including the US, leading to increased inflation and economic damage.
Financial analysts warned of potential repercussions from the tariffs, with expectations of market volatility and economic impact.
Goldman Sachs analysts suggested that the tariffs might be temporary due to their economic implications, but stressed the need for caution in handling trade policies.
Additional reporting by Claire Jones in Washington and Harriet Clarfelt in New York