Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free
Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world
Donald Trump’s legal options for imposing global tariffs have been limited by a recent court ruling that invalidated his previous duties. International legal experts suggest that Trump may need to explore alternative legal avenues to address trade issues.
The court ruling highlighted the misuse of emergency economic powers legislation by Trump in imposing blanket tariffs to reduce trade deficits globally. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) was found to be inappropriate for addressing balance of payments issues, leading experts to suggest that Trump may need to rely on other legislation such as section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
While section 122 provides limited powers to impose temporary tariffs to address balance-of-payments deficits, legal experts believe that Trump may need to seek further authorization from Congress after 150 days. The ruling emphasizes the need for Trump to consider changing the law to remove limitations on section 122.
Although the court ruling did not affect section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminium, and autos, Trump’s administration is conducting investigations into other sectors. These investigations could result in additional tariffs under different legal provisions such as section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
Furthermore, Trump may explore the use of section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose tariffs on countries that violate trade agreements in discriminatory ways. This approach was previously used to impose tariffs on Chinese imports.
The court’s decision has sparked discussions about the legal foundation of Trump’s tariffs, with some experts suggesting that incorporating tariffs into a tax bill passed by Congress could provide a more solid legal footing.
Overall, the court ruling has raised questions about the legal basis of Trump’s tariff policies and the need for potential legislative action to address trade issues effectively.