Considering the potential policies of a second Trump administration, Deutsche Bank Research explores the practical challenges of implementing a soft USD policy. Analysts emphasize the hurdles and constraints associated with such a strategy, suggesting that tariffs and their impact on the USD are more likely to shape market outcomes.
Impact of a Weak Dollar Policy
A soft USD policy aims to devalue the dollar, potentially through interventions or capital controls. Achieving this goal would require significant financial market interventions, possibly involving trillions of USD, or the implementation of costly capital controls. Analysts note that a substantial dollar devaluation, of up to 40%, would be necessary to address the trade deficit.
Challenges of Unilateral FX Intervention
Suggestions to weaken the dollar include establishing an FX reserve fund of up to $2 trillion. This approach would entail considerable additional Treasury debt and create a fiscal burden, potentially exceeding $40 billion annually in net interest expense. Political and practical obstacles are likely to hinder such interventions, especially given the massive scale required. Recent examples, like Japan’s Ministry of Finance spending $63 billion in just two days, underscore the magnitude of the challenge. Scaling this to impact the USD would demand at least $1 trillion, which is deemed unfeasible.
Limitations of Multilateral Intervention
Multilateral intervention is restricted by G7 commitments to market-based exchange rates and the limited FX reserves of major economies. Aside from Japan, G10 central banks lack adequate reserves for effective intervention. Past instances, such as the Plaza Accord, involved much larger reserves and smaller capital markets compared to today’s scenario.
Potential Capital Outflows
Encouraging US capital outflows could be another strategy to weaken the dollar. Historical efforts, like Switzerland’s in the 1970s, show limited success. Measures such as taxing foreign deposits or imposing residency-based requirements could be explored, but broad capital controls may contradict Trump’s policy to uphold the dollar’s reserve currency status.
Impact on Fed Independence
Undermining Federal Reserve independence could be the most effective means of weakening the dollar, although this scenario remains unlikely. Historical events, such as the 2022 UK crisis, demonstrate how compromising central bank independence can lead to higher inflation risk premiums and increased long-term yields. However, with only a few Federal Reserve appointments up for renewal and the requirement for Senate approval, this outcome seems improbable.
While a Trump administration may exert rhetorical pressure on the dollar, extensive financial interventions, capital controls, or a loss of Fed independence would be essential to implement a weak dollar policy. Analysts suggest that tariffs and their impact on a stronger USD are more plausible outcomes.