Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Orbler and Nivana Soul Unite to Drive Web3 Evolution with Soulful AI and DePIN

July 1, 2025

The Best Prime Day Travel Deals 2025

June 30, 2025

How to make $100,000 or more and pay no income taxes

June 30, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Tuesday, July 1
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Economic News»“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case
Economic News

“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case

December 16, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

President-elect Donald Trump has been denied immunity in the “hush money” case in New York, as ruled by Judge Juan Merchan on December 16th. The conduct described in the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is deemed unofficial and not entitled to any immunity protections, according to Merchan.

The ruling, following Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, is a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision reaffirming the immunity of official presidential conduct from criminal prosecution.

Despite Trump’s attorneys arguing that the evidence introduced by New York prosecutors during his trial was protected under the immunity doctrine, Merchan disagreed, stating that none of the challenged evidence was protected.

Even if immunity did apply, Merchan emphasized that the evidence presented in the case did not intrude on the authority and function of the Executive Branch.

The Hill reports that Trump has also sought the dismissal of the jury’s verdict and the entire case based on his White House victory. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has proposed alternatives such as freezing the proceedings during Trump’s term.

“Today’s decision by deeply conflicted, acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity, and other longstanding jurisprudence,” said Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director.

Additionally, Merchan disclosed that Trump had raised concerns of juror misconduct in a letter dated December 3, with plans to address the issue publicly with redactions.

Loading…

case Conflicted Deeply Doesnt Hush Immunity Judge Money Rules Trump York
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

A Translation Guide To Progressive Slavespeak

June 30, 2025

Dry weather pushes up UK food inflation as harvests suffer

June 30, 2025

Canada Scraps Digital Service Tax On U.S. Tech Giants To Revive Trade Talks

June 30, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Why the Amex Gold Deserves a Spot in My Wallet

March 13, 20250 Views

PennyMac’s profits shrink, but its servicing portfolio hits $680 billion

April 23, 20250 Views

How much can asset sales help Boeing?

November 18, 20240 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Crypto

Orbler and Nivana Soul Unite to Drive Web3 Evolution with Soulful AI and DePIN

July 1, 20250
Personal Finance

The Best Prime Day Travel Deals 2025

June 30, 20250
Investment

How to make $100,000 or more and pay no income taxes

June 30, 20250
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2025 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.