Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Mortgage Rates Today, Friday, August 14: A Little Lower

August 15, 2026

Post-Maduro Venezuela Wants Its $4BN In Gold Back From England

August 15, 2026

How to Buy a Condo: What to Know Before Buying

August 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Saturday, August 15
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Economic News»“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case
Economic News

“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case

December 16, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

President-elect Donald Trump has been denied immunity in the “hush money” case in New York, as ruled by Judge Juan Merchan on December 16th. The conduct described in the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is deemed unofficial and not entitled to any immunity protections, according to Merchan.

The ruling, following Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, is a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision reaffirming the immunity of official presidential conduct from criminal prosecution.

Despite Trump’s attorneys arguing that the evidence introduced by New York prosecutors during his trial was protected under the immunity doctrine, Merchan disagreed, stating that none of the challenged evidence was protected.

Even if immunity did apply, Merchan emphasized that the evidence presented in the case did not intrude on the authority and function of the Executive Branch.

The Hill reports that Trump has also sought the dismissal of the jury’s verdict and the entire case based on his White House victory. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has proposed alternatives such as freezing the proceedings during Trump’s term.

“Today’s decision by deeply conflicted, acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity, and other longstanding jurisprudence,” said Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director.

Additionally, Merchan disclosed that Trump had raised concerns of juror misconduct in a letter dated December 3, with plans to address the issue publicly with redactions.

Loading…

case Conflicted Deeply Doesnt Hush Immunity Judge Money Rules Trump York
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Post-Maduro Venezuela Wants Its $4BN In Gold Back From England

August 15, 2026

All ICE Enforcement Officers In Maine Equipped With Body-Worn Cameras, Sen. Collins Says

August 14, 2026

NATO Jets Shoot Down Drone Over Latvia, Which Blames ‘Russian Electromagnetic Warfare’

August 14, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Could Trump Reverse Engineer ESG And Use It For Good Instead Of Evil?

February 15, 20255 Views

Interview with CEO Shahaf Bar-Geffen

August 14, 20242 Views

The Dam Has Burst In Silver And Gold…So Now What?

January 17, 20267 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Personal Finance

Mortgage Rates Today, Friday, August 14: A Little Lower

August 15, 20260
Economic News

Post-Maduro Venezuela Wants Its $4BN In Gold Back From England

August 15, 20260
Real Estate

How to Buy a Condo: What to Know Before Buying

August 15, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.