Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Rogue AI “Regulation” – A Potential Worst Case Scenario

September 25, 2026

Occupied Home Staging: What to Expect

September 25, 2026

Your Guide to Bargain Hunting With Mortgage Rates Above 7%

September 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Friday, September 25
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Economic News»“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case
Economic News

“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case

December 16, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

President-elect Donald Trump has been denied immunity in the “hush money” case in New York, as ruled by Judge Juan Merchan on December 16th. The conduct described in the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is deemed unofficial and not entitled to any immunity protections, according to Merchan.

The ruling, following Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, is a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision reaffirming the immunity of official presidential conduct from criminal prosecution.

Despite Trump’s attorneys arguing that the evidence introduced by New York prosecutors during his trial was protected under the immunity doctrine, Merchan disagreed, stating that none of the challenged evidence was protected.

Even if immunity did apply, Merchan emphasized that the evidence presented in the case did not intrude on the authority and function of the Executive Branch.

The Hill reports that Trump has also sought the dismissal of the jury’s verdict and the entire case based on his White House victory. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has proposed alternatives such as freezing the proceedings during Trump’s term.

“Today’s decision by deeply conflicted, acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity, and other longstanding jurisprudence,” said Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director.

Additionally, Merchan disclosed that Trump had raised concerns of juror misconduct in a letter dated December 3, with plans to address the issue publicly with redactions.

Loading…

case Conflicted Deeply Doesnt Hush Immunity Judge Money Rules Trump York
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Rogue AI “Regulation” – A Potential Worst Case Scenario

September 25, 2026

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Just Torched Doomsday AI Bros, Says STFU About Existential Risk Or Shut It Down

September 24, 2026

Something Has Changed And World War Over Ukraine Is Back On The Table

September 24, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Xandeum introduces pNodes to improve Solana’s storage capabilities

March 28, 202511 Views

Your Top December Money Questions Answered

December 17, 20259 Views

Ozak AI Teams Up With Nosana To Scale Workloads Using Decentralized GPU

April 25, 20268 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Economic News

Rogue AI “Regulation” – A Potential Worst Case Scenario

September 25, 20260
Real Estate

Occupied Home Staging: What to Expect

September 25, 20260
Personal Finance

Your Guide to Bargain Hunting With Mortgage Rates Above 7%

September 24, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.