Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Hotel del Coronado: Historical Charm at a High Cost

May 29, 2026

Why Stable Systems Fail: The Illusion Of Institutional Control

May 29, 2026

Tennessee brokers brace for Zillow listing cutoff amid Realtracs dispute

May 29, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Saturday, May 30
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Real Estate»NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements
Real Estate

NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements

February 19, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

In early January 2025, Carla DeYoung, Tammy Jo Williams, Darlene Currie, and Carlos Alvarez filed a lawsuit in Louisiana. The lawsuit named several defendants including NAR, the Greater Baton Rouge Association of Realtors (GBRAR), New Orleans Metropolitan Association of Realtors, Bayou Board of Realtors, Greater Central Louisiana Realtors Association, Realtor Association of Acadiana, Louisiana Realtors, ROAM MLS, and Kenneth Damann from GBRAR.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have engaged in unlawful tying arrangements, forcing membership in Realtor associations to access MLS data, creating a barrier to trade.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs criticized NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement and expressed distress over the handling of the Sitzer/Burnett suit and the resulting business practice changes.

“The plaintiffs’ claims cover antitrust, First Amendment violations, Fair Housing Act violations, and common law torts. They also challenge a court-approved class action settlement, but fail to provide sufficient supporting facts for their claims,” the filing stated.

The defendants argued that the plaintiffs’ objection to the ROAM MLS policy requiring Realtor association membership for platform access does not constitute an antitrust claim, nor does it involve constitutional or fair housing law violations.

Additionally, the defendants viewed the plaintiffs’ criticism of NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement as an “improper collateral attack.”

“These allegations lack legal basis and are disconnected from any potential violation,” the motion asserted.

The defendants also pointed out that while the plaintiffs deemed ROAM MLS access as “essential” for their work, some had reportedly terminated their memberships.

agreements Dismiss Louisiana Membership NAR suit threeway
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Tennessee brokers brace for Zillow listing cutoff amid Realtracs dispute

May 29, 2026

Buying Property Abroad: What a Home in Another Country Really Demands

May 29, 2026

First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credits and Incentives in 2026

May 28, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Trump Touts “Great Progress” In China Tariff Talks, Suggests “Total Reset” On The Table

May 11, 20255 Views

US and China to launch formal trade talks

May 6, 202511 Views

What is BONK Coin?

July 27, 20247 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Personal Finance

Hotel del Coronado: Historical Charm at a High Cost

May 29, 20260
Economic News

Why Stable Systems Fail: The Illusion Of Institutional Control

May 29, 20260
Real Estate

Tennessee brokers brace for Zillow listing cutoff amid Realtracs dispute

May 29, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.