Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

SwissBorg’s USDC integration bypasses PlaygroundBridge’s up to 25% fees on Arc Network

September 20, 2026

Mortgage Rates Today, Friday, September 18: No Change

September 20, 2026

The Apocalyptic Game: Panic And Opportunity

September 20, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Sunday, September 20
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Real Estate»NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements
Real Estate

NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements

February 19, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

In early January 2025, Carla DeYoung, Tammy Jo Williams, Darlene Currie, and Carlos Alvarez filed a lawsuit in Louisiana. The lawsuit named several defendants including NAR, the Greater Baton Rouge Association of Realtors (GBRAR), New Orleans Metropolitan Association of Realtors, Bayou Board of Realtors, Greater Central Louisiana Realtors Association, Realtor Association of Acadiana, Louisiana Realtors, ROAM MLS, and Kenneth Damann from GBRAR.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have engaged in unlawful tying arrangements, forcing membership in Realtor associations to access MLS data, creating a barrier to trade.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs criticized NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement and expressed distress over the handling of the Sitzer/Burnett suit and the resulting business practice changes.

“The plaintiffs’ claims cover antitrust, First Amendment violations, Fair Housing Act violations, and common law torts. They also challenge a court-approved class action settlement, but fail to provide sufficient supporting facts for their claims,” the filing stated.

The defendants argued that the plaintiffs’ objection to the ROAM MLS policy requiring Realtor association membership for platform access does not constitute an antitrust claim, nor does it involve constitutional or fair housing law violations.

Additionally, the defendants viewed the plaintiffs’ criticism of NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement as an “improper collateral attack.”

“These allegations lack legal basis and are disconnected from any potential violation,” the motion asserted.

The defendants also pointed out that while the plaintiffs deemed ROAM MLS access as “essential” for their work, some had reportedly terminated their memberships.

agreements Dismiss Louisiana Membership NAR suit threeway
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Why Floor Plans Matter When Comparing Homes

September 20, 2026

What Is a Floor Plan? What Homebuyers Should Look For

September 19, 2026

Does a New Roof Increase Home Value?

September 19, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

6 Ways to Avoid a Financial Hangover

December 11, 20247 Views

Dogecoin ‘Looks Undeniably Impulsive’ – DOGE/BTC Ratio Uncovers Strong Accumulation

January 5, 20253 Views

How to Detect a Gas Leak in Your Home

April 5, 202521 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Crypto

SwissBorg’s USDC integration bypasses PlaygroundBridge’s up to 25% fees on Arc Network

September 20, 20260
Personal Finance

Mortgage Rates Today, Friday, September 18: No Change

September 20, 20260
Economic News

The Apocalyptic Game: Panic And Opportunity

September 20, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.