Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Where to Buy Gold Bullion in 2026

February 9, 2026

Lighter teams up with Axiom to roll out EVM rollup

February 9, 2026

Hyperliquid sees $123M in liquidations yet rivals stay quiet – Why?

February 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Monday, February 9
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Real Estate»NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements
Real Estate

NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements

February 19, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

In early January 2025, Carla DeYoung, Tammy Jo Williams, Darlene Currie, and Carlos Alvarez filed a lawsuit in Louisiana. The lawsuit named several defendants including NAR, the Greater Baton Rouge Association of Realtors (GBRAR), New Orleans Metropolitan Association of Realtors, Bayou Board of Realtors, Greater Central Louisiana Realtors Association, Realtor Association of Acadiana, Louisiana Realtors, ROAM MLS, and Kenneth Damann from GBRAR.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have engaged in unlawful tying arrangements, forcing membership in Realtor associations to access MLS data, creating a barrier to trade.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs criticized NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement and expressed distress over the handling of the Sitzer/Burnett suit and the resulting business practice changes.

“The plaintiffs’ claims cover antitrust, First Amendment violations, Fair Housing Act violations, and common law torts. They also challenge a court-approved class action settlement, but fail to provide sufficient supporting facts for their claims,” the filing stated.

The defendants argued that the plaintiffs’ objection to the ROAM MLS policy requiring Realtor association membership for platform access does not constitute an antitrust claim, nor does it involve constitutional or fair housing law violations.

Additionally, the defendants viewed the plaintiffs’ criticism of NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement as an “improper collateral attack.”

“These allegations lack legal basis and are disconnected from any potential violation,” the motion asserted.

The defendants also pointed out that while the plaintiffs deemed ROAM MLS access as “essential” for their work, some had reportedly terminated their memberships.

agreements Dismiss Louisiana Membership NAR suit threeway
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

What is Escrow Holdback? A Seller’s Guide

February 9, 2026

Why purpose-built software pays off

February 9, 2026

Is a Fixer-Upper or Move-In Ready Home a Better Buy?

February 8, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Next Gold Move Will Surprise The World

March 1, 20254 Views

Global stock markets tumble as Donald Trump’s tariffs loom

March 31, 20251 Views

10 Major Industries in South Carolina for Job Hunters

December 21, 20244 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Personal Finance

Where to Buy Gold Bullion in 2026

February 9, 20260
Crypto

Lighter teams up with Axiom to roll out EVM rollup

February 9, 20260
Crypto

Hyperliquid sees $123M in liquidations yet rivals stay quiet – Why?

February 9, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.