Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

If the USPS Runs Out of Money, Will You Still Get Mail?

March 26, 2026

4AI Collaborates with PlutonAI to Drive DeFAI Innovation in Web3 via AI Agents

March 26, 2026

MemeCore: How M could target $2.57 after 107% volume spike

March 26, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Friday, March 27
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Economic News»“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case
Economic News

“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case

December 16, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

President-elect Donald Trump has been denied immunity in the “hush money” case in New York, as ruled by Judge Juan Merchan on December 16th. The conduct described in the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is deemed unofficial and not entitled to any immunity protections, according to Merchan.

The ruling, following Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, is a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision reaffirming the immunity of official presidential conduct from criminal prosecution.

Despite Trump’s attorneys arguing that the evidence introduced by New York prosecutors during his trial was protected under the immunity doctrine, Merchan disagreed, stating that none of the challenged evidence was protected.

Even if immunity did apply, Merchan emphasized that the evidence presented in the case did not intrude on the authority and function of the Executive Branch.

The Hill reports that Trump has also sought the dismissal of the jury’s verdict and the entire case based on his White House victory. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has proposed alternatives such as freezing the proceedings during Trump’s term.

“Today’s decision by deeply conflicted, acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity, and other longstanding jurisprudence,” said Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director.

Additionally, Merchan disclosed that Trump had raised concerns of juror misconduct in a letter dated December 3, with plans to address the issue publicly with redactions.

Loading…

case Conflicted Deeply Doesnt Hush Immunity Judge Money Rules Trump York
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

If the USPS Runs Out of Money, Will You Still Get Mail?

March 26, 2026

United Airlines CEO Warns Summer Airfares Will Spike, Tells Travelers To Book Now

March 26, 2026

Zelensky: Trump Pressuring Him To Give Up On Donbas And End War Soon

March 26, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s feud erupts over tax bill

June 5, 20251 Views

Analyst Predicts $200k Bitcoin On Incoming ‘Supply Shock’

November 20, 20242 Views

Unsecured Business Loans: Best Options and How to Get One

August 15, 20250 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Personal Finance

If the USPS Runs Out of Money, Will You Still Get Mail?

March 26, 20260
Crypto

4AI Collaborates with PlutonAI to Drive DeFAI Innovation in Web3 via AI Agents

March 26, 20260
Crypto

MemeCore: How M could target $2.57 after 107% volume spike

March 26, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.