Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

HyperGPT and UQUID Ensure Smarter and Accessible OnChain Shopping Experience

January 25, 2026

Weekly Mortgage Rates Remain Near 6% As Inflation Heats Up

January 25, 2026

Escobar: The Real “Rupture” In Davos

January 25, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Sunday, January 25
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Economic News»“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case
Economic News

“Deeply Conflicted” Judge Rules Trump Doesn’t Have Immunity In New York ‘Hush Money’ Case

December 16, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

President-elect Donald Trump has been denied immunity in the “hush money” case in New York, as ruled by Judge Juan Merchan on December 16th. The conduct described in the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is deemed unofficial and not entitled to any immunity protections, according to Merchan.

The ruling, following Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, is a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision reaffirming the immunity of official presidential conduct from criminal prosecution.

Despite Trump’s attorneys arguing that the evidence introduced by New York prosecutors during his trial was protected under the immunity doctrine, Merchan disagreed, stating that none of the challenged evidence was protected.

Even if immunity did apply, Merchan emphasized that the evidence presented in the case did not intrude on the authority and function of the Executive Branch.

The Hill reports that Trump has also sought the dismissal of the jury’s verdict and the entire case based on his White House victory. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has proposed alternatives such as freezing the proceedings during Trump’s term.

“Today’s decision by deeply conflicted, acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity, and other longstanding jurisprudence,” said Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director.

Additionally, Merchan disclosed that Trump had raised concerns of juror misconduct in a letter dated December 3, with plans to address the issue publicly with redactions.

Loading…

case Conflicted Deeply Doesnt Hush Immunity Judge Money Rules Trump York
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Escobar: The Real “Rupture” In Davos

January 25, 2026

Judge Orders Release Of Minnesota Church Agitators Nekima Armstrong, Chauntyll Allen

January 24, 2026

Suicidal Empathy Is Another Front In The CCP’s Hybrid War

January 24, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Fed’s paper losses top the $200 billion mark

October 3, 20240 Views

Exclusive-China dials up scrutiny of Big Four audit firms after Evergrande probe, sources say By Reuters

July 25, 20240 Views

Sweden To Pay Migrants Who’ve Failed To Integrate Nearly €31,000 To Return Home

September 16, 20240 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Crypto

HyperGPT and UQUID Ensure Smarter and Accessible OnChain Shopping Experience

January 25, 20260
Personal Finance

Weekly Mortgage Rates Remain Near 6% As Inflation Heats Up

January 25, 20260
Economic News

Escobar: The Real “Rupture” In Davos

January 25, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.