Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

If the USPS Runs Out of Money, Will You Still Get Mail?

March 26, 2026

4AI Collaborates with PlutonAI to Drive DeFAI Innovation in Web3 via AI Agents

March 26, 2026

MemeCore: How M could target $2.57 after 107% volume spike

March 26, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Thursday, March 26
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Real Estate»NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements
Real Estate

NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements

February 19, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

In early January 2025, Carla DeYoung, Tammy Jo Williams, Darlene Currie, and Carlos Alvarez filed a lawsuit in Louisiana. The lawsuit named several defendants including NAR, the Greater Baton Rouge Association of Realtors (GBRAR), New Orleans Metropolitan Association of Realtors, Bayou Board of Realtors, Greater Central Louisiana Realtors Association, Realtor Association of Acadiana, Louisiana Realtors, ROAM MLS, and Kenneth Damann from GBRAR.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have engaged in unlawful tying arrangements, forcing membership in Realtor associations to access MLS data, creating a barrier to trade.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs criticized NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement and expressed distress over the handling of the Sitzer/Burnett suit and the resulting business practice changes.

“The plaintiffs’ claims cover antitrust, First Amendment violations, Fair Housing Act violations, and common law torts. They also challenge a court-approved class action settlement, but fail to provide sufficient supporting facts for their claims,” the filing stated.

The defendants argued that the plaintiffs’ objection to the ROAM MLS policy requiring Realtor association membership for platform access does not constitute an antitrust claim, nor does it involve constitutional or fair housing law violations.

Additionally, the defendants viewed the plaintiffs’ criticism of NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement as an “improper collateral attack.”

“These allegations lack legal basis and are disconnected from any potential violation,” the motion asserted.

The defendants also pointed out that while the plaintiffs deemed ROAM MLS access as “essential” for their work, some had reportedly terminated their memberships.

agreements Dismiss Louisiana Membership NAR suit threeway
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Monthly Expenses List: What to Include in Your Budget

March 26, 2026

Insurance is having a growing impact on condo affordability

March 26, 2026

Moving Soon After Buying a Home: What to Know

March 25, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

America has an innovation and incumbency problem

September 12, 20243 Views

U.S. Tells “Maryland Father”: No Asylum, Next Stop Eswatini

September 6, 20251 Views

THORChain to Broaden Cross-Chain Ecosystem by Enabling Base Swaps

January 23, 20253 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Personal Finance

If the USPS Runs Out of Money, Will You Still Get Mail?

March 26, 20260
Crypto

4AI Collaborates with PlutonAI to Drive DeFAI Innovation in Web3 via AI Agents

March 26, 20260
Crypto

MemeCore: How M could target $2.57 after 107% volume spike

March 26, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.