Close Menu
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Institutions Embrace Stablecoins on Base Platform

October 3, 2026

Should U.S. Bank’s New Credit Cards be ‘Essential’ for Your Business?

October 3, 2026

Cardano expands in Japan – So why is ADA’s price down 4%?

October 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
Saturday, October 3
Doorpickers
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Economic News
  • Stock Market
  • Real Estate
  • Crypto
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Banking
Doorpickers
Home»Real Estate»NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements
Real Estate

NAR looks to dismiss Louisiana suit on three-way membership agreements

February 19, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

In early January 2025, Carla DeYoung, Tammy Jo Williams, Darlene Currie, and Carlos Alvarez filed a lawsuit in Louisiana. The lawsuit named several defendants including NAR, the Greater Baton Rouge Association of Realtors (GBRAR), New Orleans Metropolitan Association of Realtors, Bayou Board of Realtors, Greater Central Louisiana Realtors Association, Realtor Association of Acadiana, Louisiana Realtors, ROAM MLS, and Kenneth Damann from GBRAR.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants have engaged in unlawful tying arrangements, forcing membership in Realtor associations to access MLS data, creating a barrier to trade.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs criticized NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement and expressed distress over the handling of the Sitzer/Burnett suit and the resulting business practice changes.

“The plaintiffs’ claims cover antitrust, First Amendment violations, Fair Housing Act violations, and common law torts. They also challenge a court-approved class action settlement, but fail to provide sufficient supporting facts for their claims,” the filing stated.

The defendants argued that the plaintiffs’ objection to the ROAM MLS policy requiring Realtor association membership for platform access does not constitute an antitrust claim, nor does it involve constitutional or fair housing law violations.

Additionally, the defendants viewed the plaintiffs’ criticism of NAR’s commission lawsuit settlement agreement as an “improper collateral attack.”

“These allegations lack legal basis and are disconnected from any potential violation,” the motion asserted.

The defendants also pointed out that while the plaintiffs deemed ROAM MLS access as “essential” for their work, some had reportedly terminated their memberships.

agreements Dismiss Louisiana Membership NAR suit threeway
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

What Is a Flex Room? 5 Benefits and Uses

October 2, 2026

The 10 Rainiest Cities in the U.S.

October 2, 2026

6 Tips to Improve Homebuyer Confidence

October 1, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

The Best And Worst Performing Assets Of The “March Meltdown” And “Queezy Q1”

April 1, 20253 Views

NRMLA backs New Jersey bill clarifying reverse mortgage rules

January 3, 20267 Views

TRX Price Breaks Out as TRON’s $2.1T USDT Activity Signals Stronger Network Demand

August 12, 20266 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest
Crypto

Institutions Embrace Stablecoins on Base Platform

October 3, 20260
Personal Finance

Should U.S. Bank’s New Credit Cards be ‘Essential’ for Your Business?

October 3, 20260
Crypto

Cardano expands in Japan – So why is ADA’s price down 4%?

October 3, 20260
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2026 doorpickers.com - All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.