Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us
Throughout my writings, I have delved into the concept of the “Pillager Class” versus the “Producer Class”, seeking to understand why certain individuals, groups, and societies tend towards looting and destruction rather than creating something of value themselves.
This dilemma is not new to the western world; it has been a recurring challenge for millennia. While we strive to innovate, build, and plan for the future, there are those who find it easier to simply take what we have. They operate like parasites, draining resources subtly or like locusts, ravaging everything in their path.
There are various theories attempting to explain this behavior. Some attribute it to genetics, others to low intelligence, some view it as a cultural trend, and still others see it as a response to poverty. Likely, it is a combination of all these factors. At its core, it appears that certain groups are innately driven by a pillaging instinct, forever trapped in a cycle of scavenging.
An apt analogy is the “lottery winner” scenario. Statistics show that around 70% of lottery winners squander their winnings within 5 years. Regardless of the amount won, they struggle to hold onto their wealth. They lack the capacity to plan for the future, their thinking confined to the present moment. Their inability to look beyond immediate gratification dooms them to perpetual poverty.
The pillager class exhibits similar traits. Even when provided with ample opportunities to improve their circumstances, they opt for theft and savagery. They are ungrateful for the handouts, feeling entitled to more. They do not appreciate the opportunities afforded to them; instead, they demand more and more, justifying their actions with baseless claims of deserving better conditions.
Currently, in France, migrant rioters justify their looting and destruction by citing a desire for improved education, living standards, and political influence. In reality, their motives lie in opportunistic theft and chaos. Their moral argument for pillaging Paris revolves around an unwarranted sense of entitlement in a country that welcomed them with open arms.
Beyond the typical pillager mentality lies a deeper conspiracy fueling multicultural influx. In my article “Pillagers vs Producers: There’s Only Two Ways To Save The Western World”, I explore the collaboration between third-world cultures and Marxist ideologies, which poses a significant threat to the western world.
Efforts to thwart the orchestrated dismantling of our society are not new. A book published in 1973, “The Camp Of The Saints” by Jean Raspail, prophetically portrays the migrant crisis in Europe, foretelling the downfall of the west at the hands of a liberal-left alliance with third-world pillagers.
The novel highlights the symbiotic relationship between the progressives, embracing atheism, Marxism, and globalism, and the third-world migrants. This alliance aims to undermine western civilizations, using compassion and guilt as tools to facilitate mass immigration.
The narrative follows the character of Ballan, a godless leftist philosopher, as he orchestrates the migration of an Indian man known as the “Turd-Eater” to Europe. Ballan turns the Turd-Eater into a demagogue, leading a migrant horde to France, symbolizing the impending demise of the west.
Today, leftist activists manipulate migrants to exploit western values and principles, employing a false narrative of freedom and multiculturalism to further their agenda. This calculated strategy aims to subvert our heritage and erode our societal fabric.
The Camp Of The Saints underscores the dangers of western self-loathing and the liberal inclination to prioritize foreign interests over domestic welfare. It warns against the ideological suicide propelled by misplaced empathy and moral duty.
The globalist agenda, backed by NGOs and the UN, capitalizes on the pillager class, weaponizing them to destabilize the US and Europe in pursuit of a borderless socialist utopia. The narrative condemns the west’s historical achievements and advocates for its cultural dilution.
It is imperative to reject the narrative of western guilt and embrace the superiority of our civilization. Selectivity, meritocracy, and unwavering principles are essential to safeguarding our heritage from the onslaught of third-world invasion.
The demise of our civilization is not inevitable; it is a consequence of our complacency and acquiescence. As Jean Raspail aptly states in The Camp Of The Saints:
“In the strange war that was coming, victory would go to those who loved themselves the most…”
Let us heed this warning and rise to defend our values, lest we succumb to the self-destructive forces of liberalism and globalism.
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ZeroHedge.