US intelligence officials are cautioning that intervening in Israel’s war could push Iran to pursue nuclear weapons despite longstanding consensus that Iran has not been building a nuclear bomb. President Trump is hesitant about getting involved in Israel’s regime-change plans, fearing a repeat of the chaos in Libya.
In other news, Trump has hinted at a possible diplomatic solution with Iran in the next two weeks. The Pentagon has raised concerns about the effectiveness of bunker-buster bombs in destroying Iran’s nuclear facility and the potential need for a nuclear bomb. Steve Bannon, a strong opponent of US involvement in Israel’s war, met with Trump. Iran’s internet blackout is seen as a precaution against cyberattacks. Israel and Iran continue to exchange attacks.
Senior intelligence officials believe that US actions like attacking Iran’s enrichment facility or assassinating the Iranian leader could prompt Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Despite Israeli claims, analysts suggest it would take several months to a year for Iran to have a missile-ready warhead. The US assessment contradicts claims of an imminent Iranian nuclear bomb.
Iran, a signatory to the NPT, had agreed to restrictions under the JCPOA, which Trump withdrew from in 2018. Trump’s decision-making on US involvement in Israel’s war reflects concerns about Iran becoming a failed state post-regime change, similar to Libya’s fate after Gaddafi’s downfall. Gaddafi’s surrender of his nuclear program in 2003 did not prevent his demise in a US-NATO intervention in 2011. The cautionary tale of Gaddafi’s downfall serves as a stark warning to leaders worldwide facing American pressure. After relinquishing his nuclear program, the Libyan leader met a gruesome end in Obama and Clinton’s regime-change crusade. The aftermath of their intervention left Libya in chaos, with reports of black people being sold as slaves in open markets and a surge of illegal immigrants fleeing to Europe from the Western-made disaster zone.
Trump, recognizing the disastrous outcomes of past interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, is hesitant to repeat the same mistakes. The conservative voices, led by Tucker Carlson and MAGA supporters, are urging him to steer clear of foreign policy blunders. Will the growing right-wing dissent influence Trump’s decisions?
The repercussions of failed interventions, both past and potential, loom large as Trump navigates his foreign policy choices. It is crucial for leaders to heed the lessons of history and avoid plunging into another overseas quagmire.