Authored by Brahma Chellaney via Project Sybndicate,
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s rule is characterized by surveillance, repression, and the elimination of potential rivals to maintain power through fear. However, this approach lacks a foundation for long-term stability, making Xi increasingly vulnerable as he consolidates power.
Xi Jinping has tightened his control over the Communist Party of China, the state apparatus, and the military during his 13 years in power. His recent purge of top-ranking generals illustrates his continued paranoia and insecurity.
While Xi initially cracked down on corruption within the CPC and the PLA, it became apparent that this was a tool to consolidate power rather than promote transparency. Loyalty to Xi, rather than competence or integrity, became the key to advancement in China under his rule.
Despite promoting only loyalists, Xi continues to dismiss officials, including top military commanders, leading to widespread indictments for corruption and unexplained disappearances. The recent purge of military leaders, including General He Weidong, reflects Xi’s ongoing efforts to maintain control.
Xi’s regime justifies these purges as necessary disciplinary actions, but it is likely a strategy to eliminate potential rivals and secure his grip on power. Xi’s refusal to designate a successor, even at 72 years old, highlights his insecurity and fear of losing power.
This pattern of purges and dismissals has eroded trust among China’s elite and weakened institutional cohesion. Xi’s emphasis on loyalty over competence is undermining Chinese governance and military readiness.
Xi’s insecurity is particularly detrimental to China’s military, as his purges disrupt military planning and leadership, potentially compromising national security. Replacing experienced commanders with untested loyalists may secure Xi’s political position but does little to enhance China’s military capabilities.
By ruling through fear and coercion, Xi risks strategic miscalculations that could lead to conflict. His approach may breed discontent and fragility rather than genuine loyalty and stability.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge.
Loading recommendations…